Indian Government Raises Concerns Over Wikipedia’s Accuracy and Neutrality

The Indian government has expressed concerns to Wikipedia regarding alleged bias and inaccuracies in its content. The government is questioning whether the platform should be considered a publisher rather than just an intermediary, according to sources on Tuesday.

Government's Concerns About Wikipedia

The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting raised several complaints in a communication to Wikipedia. The ministry pointed out that the platform's editorial control seems to be in the hands of a small group of people, which could challenge its claim of being a neutral, volunteer-based resource. This, according to officials, raises doubts about whether Wikipedia can still be considered unbiased and impartial.

Legal Battle Over Defamatory Content

The issue has escalated to a court case involving Justice Navin Chawla. The case revolves around content on Wikipedia that ANI (Asian News International) claims is defamatory. ANI alleges that its Wikipedia page was edited to describe it as a "propaganda tool" for the current government. In response, ANI filed a defamation suit and sought court orders to compel Wikipedia to reveal the identities of the users responsible for these edits.

Court’s Strong Stand Against Wikipedia

Justice Chawla, who is presiding over the case, did not mince words in his remarks. He warned that if Wikipedia continued to ignore court orders, it could face serious consequences. He said, "I will impose contempt... If you don't want to comply with Indian regulations, then don’t operate in India. We will close your business transactions here. We will ask the government to block Wikipedia."

The court’s warning is a sign that the government and judiciary are becoming increasingly concerned about the platform's operations in India.

Wikipedia’s Defense and Challenges

Wikipedia, which allows users to create and edit pages on various topics, has defended itself in this case. It requested more time to comply with the court’s directive, arguing that its lack of a physical office in India makes it difficult to follow local laws.

However, Justice Chawla rejected this excuse, emphasizing that the platform needs to respond promptly. He warned Wikipedia that failure to comply with court orders would lead to contempt proceedings.

Also read: Supreme Court Ruling: Not All Private Property Can Be Acquired by States Under

SUMMARY

The Indian government has raised concerns with Wikipedia over possible bias and inaccuracies in its content. The government questioned whether Wikipedia should be seen as a publisher rather than just a platform for sharing information. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting pointed out that a small group seems to control the content on Wikipedia, which could affect its neutrality.

The issue is part of a legal case involving ANI (Asian News International), which claims that its Wikipedia page was edited to call it a “propaganda tool” for the current government. ANI filed a defamation suit and asked the court to force Wikipedia to reveal the identities of the people who made these edits.

The court, led by Justice Navin Chawla, has warned that if Wikipedia continues to ignore court orders, it could face serious consequences, like being banned in India. Wikipedia argued that it has no physical office in India, making it harder to follow local laws, but the court rejected this excuse.

In short, Wikipedia is facing legal challenges in India over its content and could face penalties if it doesn’t follow the court’s orders.