NewsPoliticsEntertainmentSportsHealth & LifestyleEconomy & Tech

Muzaffar Shah declares preemptive win ahead of Supreme Court's Article 370 Verdict

Jammu and Kashmir Awami National Conference's Vice President, Muzaffar Shah, expressed confidence on Monday that, based on the arguments presented in the Supreme Court, "we have already won the case" challenging the abrogation of Article 370. Also Read: Australia Unveils...
12:12 PM Dec 11, 2023 IST | Aakash Khuman
article 370

Jammu and Kashmir Awami National Conference's Vice President, Muzaffar Shah, expressed confidence on Monday that, based on the arguments presented in the Supreme Court, "we have already won the case" challenging the abrogation of Article 370.

Also Read: Australia Unveils Plans to Drastically Reduce Migrant Intake and Tighten Visa Rules

A Constitution bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, will decide the constitutionality of the Centre's decision on August 5, 2019, to abrogate the provisions of Article 370, which granted special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.

"We expect the verdict according to the Constitution of the country. As CJI had said he is the first and last disciple of the Constitution. As per the arguments we have put in front of the Court, we already have won this case. Let's see what happens now; Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh stand on the same page. Article 370 will have to come back to its shape. We are hopeful for the best and ready for the worst," Shah told ANI.

"You (Centre) revoked it by taking it to Parliament without the Jammu Kashmir Constituent Assembly. The whole world is watching this case today," he added.

National Conference MP Hasnain Masoodi said they "are hopeful that the decision will be in favor of the people of Jammu & Kashmir.

"We are in favor of peace. The government did not answer our questions and only said that tourism has increased," he told ANI.

Security has been heightened in Srinagar ahead of the Supreme Court's verdict on the batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir.

On September 5, the apex court reserved the judgment after hearing the arguments for 16 days.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, had said that Article 370 was no longer a "temporary provision" and had assumed permanence post the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir.

The Central government had defended its decision to abolish Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, saying that after the changes, street violence, which was engineered and orchestrated by terrorists and secessionist networks, has now become a thing of the past.

Since 2019, when Article 370 was abrogated, the entire region has witnessed an "unprecedented era of peace, progress and prosperity," the Centre said.

Several petitions were filed in the top court, including those of private individuals, lawyers, activists, politicians and political parties challenging the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which splits Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

On August 5, 2019, the central government announced the revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir granted under Article 370 and split the region into two union territories.

Also Read: Income Tax Raids Uncover Massive Cash Hoard in Odisha: SBI to Handle Deposits

OTT India updates you with the latest news, Country’s no.1 digital news platform OTT India, Keeps you updated with national, and international news from all around the world. For more such updates, download the OTT India app on your Android and IOS device.

Tags :
AbrogationArticle 370Central governmentChief Justice of IndiaConstitution benchConstitutionalityDY ChandrachudHasnain MasoodiJammu and KashmirKapil SibalMuzaffar ShahNational ConferencePeaceprogressProsperityrevocationsecuritySrinagarsupreme courtUnion territoriesVerdict
Next Article